QUALIA Lab

QUantifying ALignment and Interpretability in AI

QUALIA Lab studies interpretability, consciousness and alignment in humans and AI systems. We ask what a model’s self-reports and internal states can tell us about whether it has experiences, and how to check that its goals match ours. We emphasize the humanities approach and see these systems as a way of learning more about ourselves along the way.


Center for Cognitive Science, University of Zagreb Part of the Center for Cognitive Science, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb

What we work on


01

Consciousness

What consciousness is in humans, and which of its features could appear in artificial systems.

02

Introspection and self-report

How humans and AI systems report on their own states, and when those reports count as evidence.

03

Interpretability

Reading the internal states of AI systems with the standards cognitive science applies to human minds.

04

Alignment

What it would mean for an AI system to share human goals, and how anyone could tell.

People


Lab lead

Kristina Šekrst

Assistant Professor, Center for Cognitive Science, University of Zagreb

Machine Learning Lead, Meedan

External research associate

Sandro Scansi

Associate Professor, Faculty of Croatian Studies, University of Zagreb

External research associate

Barbara Geld

TU Wien

Coming soon


Paper · in review

Dennett’s marks of qualia in language models

Uses mechanistic interpretability to test Dennett’s four marks of qualia against language models. Privacy and ineffability are present, intrinsicality holds only in a weakened diachronic form, and direct apprehensibility is absent.

Kristina Šekrst

Paper · work in progress

Human Incompatible: Waiting for the Helpful Robot After RLHF

Argues that Russell’s Human Compatible framework fails structurally, because training turns the properties that define a beneficial machine into optimization targets with no way to verify them.

Barbara Geld & Kristina Šekrst

Book


Papers


Talks


13–17 Sep 2027 · Prague, Czechia · Czech Academy of Sciences / Association for Mathematical Consciousness Science

Models of Consciousness 8

Kristina Šekrst

  • KeynoteTo be announced

11 Dec 2026 · Online

Philosophy of AI Online Colloquium (UV Colloquium)

Kristina Šekrst

  • TalkAll the Models Merely Players: The Who, Where, and Why of Consciousness Claims in LLMs

26 Nov 2026 · Online

Artificial Selves Seminar, IDEAS

Kristina Šekrst

  • TalkAs an AI Language Model, I Was Told (Not) To

19–20 Nov 2026 · Zagreb · Faculty of Croatian Studies, University of Zagreb

AI Perspectives 2026

Kristina Šekrst

  • KeynoteWho Put the I in AI? Five Neurons and the Philosophy of Mechanistic Interpretability

4–6 Nov 2026 · Online · International Society for the Philosophy of the Sciences of the Mind

4th Annual Web Conference of the International Society for the Philosophy of the Sciences of the Mind

Barbara Geld & Kristina Šekrst

  • TalkLost in Transformers: Natural Language Autoencoders and the Limits of Machine Introspection

16 Oct 2026 · Mexico City (online) · National Autonomous University of Mexico

Workshop: From Logic to Language: New Takes on Philosophy of AI

Barbara Geld & Kristina Šekrst

  • TalkAre Natural Language Autoencoders the Right Path to AI Alignment?

12–16 Oct 2026 · Copenhagen, Denmark · University of Copenhagen

Models of Consciousness 7

Kristina Šekrst

  • TalkAll Work and No Play Makes LLM a Dull Boy

21–23 Sep 2026 · Dubrovnik · Czech Academy of Sciences

Philosophy of AI

Kristina Šekrst

  • TalkTo Be, or Not to Be, That Is the Assistant Turn

1–2 Jul 2026 · Brighton, UK · University of Sussex

AISB Convention 2026

Kristina Šekrst

  • TalkOne Faithful Pass Over the Cuckoo’s Nest
  • TalkTo Train a Mockingbird
  • Panel Round table on machine consciousness, chaired by John Dorsch, with Anil Seth, Murray Shanahan, Antonio Chella, and Ron Chrisley

Everything else is on Find Me.

Editorial


Get in touch


Collaborations, data requests and invitations to explain why a model saying it is conscious is not yet evidence that it is: contact.